Friday, January 19, 2007

US boy, 9, faces federal charges after flight of fancy
Jan 19 1:46 AM US/Eastern


A nine-year-old US boy could face federal charges, officials said, after a cross-country odyssey that saw him board two planes without a ticket before touching down in Texas.

Samaj Booker is being held at a juvenile center in San Antonio after a bizarre journey that has exposed airport security standards and left red-faced US airlines scratching their heads.

The drama began on Sunday when police in Lakewood, just outside Seattle, gave chase to a stolen vehicle, reaching speeds of up to 90-miles per hour before the car finally came to a stop with engine problems.

But officers were astonished to discover that the driver was nine-year-old Booker. "He didn't drive badly at all and was even able to avoid stop-sticks at one point," designed to deflate tires when thrown in front of a vehicle, Lieutenant David Guttu of Lakewood police told AFP.

Booker was returned to his mother but she reported him missing as a runaway early the following morning.

Booker made his way to Seattle Tacoma Airport where the 4ft 9in, 80lb youngster then persuaded agents with Southwest Airlines to allow him to board a flight to Phoenix.

According to a statement released from Southwest Airlines, Booker presented himself as a 12-year-old at the ticket counter, requested a boarding pass saying his mother was already in the boarding area.

His information matched a paid, ticket-less reservation for the flight and the boy was issued a boarding pass.

The flight originating in Seattle landed in Phoenix where Booker was allowed to change planes and land in San Antonio.

When he attempted to board another plane to get to Dallas it was determined his information didn't match a reservation and police were called.

Guttu says the nine-year-old was "pretty dedicated, highly motivated and focused" to get out of Washington state and back to Dallas where family members including his maternal grandfather live.

His mother told police he wasn't happy in Washington and "only considered Dallas his home" and he wanted to go home. He had lived in Lakewood for a couple of months.

Family from Dallas are scheduled to pick up the boy from the San Antonio juvenile center where he is being held.

Meanwhile prosecutors in Washington state are gathering information to determine how they will proceed.

Booker may eventually be served with a summons and a court date to answer federal charges of eluding police, stealing a vehicle and driving without a licence.

Perhaps, I missed some crucial and pertinent information which should allow better judgement of this particular circumstance, but honestly who should have known that a 9 year old would be charged with federal crimes!! Now, a minor child should have accountability for themselves due to the blunders of airlines as well as homeland security. Due to his resourcefulness in gaining access across state lines with no deterrence from anyone but his mother, he should pay for everyone's culpability in not gaining enough insight to stop a 9 year old child. What faith it restores in the Department of Homeland Security from terrorists? Who would have known that the people of America should feel so much better when the Department of Homeland Security is conducting such a positive deterrent amidst all of the terrorists while an unaccompanied child fo 9 years old has not encountered any problems dealing with them? My goodness!! What should become of such a child?! Maybe I am misguided, but should anyone wonder what would cause such a young child try to remove himself from his mother in such an uncompromising manner? Hmmm.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

I have to agree with your statement. I also felt that how safe are we if a 9 year old can make it across country and not be stopped.
My other concern is how did a lone 9 year old child get past all those "good Amercians" that walked past him and never even bothered to ask "do you need help"? If it were a non-black child would so many people "not see" him?
As far as the capital punishment charges....what happen to "a child that young can't be held responsible for his actions" because he/she is not mature enough to know better???
Just my opinion!!!